Olympus SZ-11 vs Sony T900
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus SZ-11 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SZ-11 vs Sony T900 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus SZ-11 versus Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SZ-11 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly similar and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe SZ-11 was manufactured 2 years after the T900 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SZ-11 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the SZ-11 grades vs the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SZ-11 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SZ-11 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-11 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Sony T900
| SZ-11 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus SZ-11
| T900 | SZ-11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-11 and Sony T900
| SZ-11 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus SZ-11 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SZ-11 enjoys exterior dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SZ-11 versus Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the SZ-11 versus the T900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-11 and T900 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SZ-11 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The image underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-11 and T900.
To sum up, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus SZ-11 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger SZ-11 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-11 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SZ-11 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-11 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus SZ-11 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2011-07-27 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226g (0.50 lb) | 143g (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $253 | $300 |
