Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8df78/8df78639e31f6f9cab0cd6bb2ccb49100f8299fb" alt="Olympus SZ-12 front Olympus SZ-12 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- New Model is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus SZ-12 versus Olympus TG-860, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SZ-12 (14MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SZ-12 was launched 4 years prior to the TG-860 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the SZ-12 matches up vs the TG-860 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-12 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-12 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus TG-860
SZ-12 | TG-860 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus SZ-12
TG-860 | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 37 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Olympus TG-860
SZ-12 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-12 has external dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SZ-12 versus Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the SZ-12 and the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75dc2/75dc250cb30604ebe3bd281efae0da7fe52897b8" alt="Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-12 and TG-860 is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a2eb/3a2eba234024669d48787ce581890d64b141fa22" alt="Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The pic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-12 and TG-860.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-860 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged SZ-12 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8290/e8290123ee99a1bd0c1a08545a0627dbea3eee6a" alt="Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd6e6/cd6e68344e1c9c9dfeba67bef72a250a920578ac" alt="Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus SZ-12 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SZ-12 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 300 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $350 | $279 |