Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus VR-330
Portability
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
Olympus SZ-12
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2012
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and both are built by Olympus. The resolution of the SZ-12 (14MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly similar and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SZ-12 was unveiled 12 months after the VR-330 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SZ-12 matches up versus the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SZ-12 & Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-12 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus VR-330
| SZ-12 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus SZ-12
| VR-330 | SZ-12 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Olympus VR-330
| SZ-12 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-12 comes with physical dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the SZ-12 compared to the VR-330.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-12 and VR-330 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The pic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-12 and VR-330.
Plainly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of images although you need to take the age of the products into consideration. The newer SZ-12 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SZ-12 Portrait photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography advice
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus SZ-12 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (226 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus SZ-12
Sports photography with Olympus VR-330
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
features tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery power (220 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus SZ-12 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competition (226 grams)
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
no Timelapse mode
bad battery power (220 shots)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Olympus SZ-12 Landscape photography factors
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography factors
quite wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
bad battery power (220 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Olympus SZ-12 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
quite wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (226 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone port
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (158g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SZ-12 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-12 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SZ-12 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $350 | $220 |