Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36


92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Updated by Ricoh GR Digital IV

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the SZ-12 (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the SZ-12 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizing.

The SZ-12 was introduced 2 years later than the GR Digital III and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SZ-12 grades versus the GR Digital III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-12 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
SZ-12 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus SZ-12
GR Digital III | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GR Digital III
SZ-12 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-12 comes with physical dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the SZ-12 against the GR Digital III.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-12 and GR Digital III is 89 and 92 respectively.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-12 and GR Digital III.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SZ-12 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus SZ-12 will deliver greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more modern SZ-12 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226g (0.50 lb) | 208g (0.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $350 | $399 |