Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SZ-12 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SZ-12 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") offer different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe SZ-12 was launched 4 months later than the GR Digital IV so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the SZ-12 scores against the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-12 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-12 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
SZ-12 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus SZ-12
GR Digital IV | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
SZ-12 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | September 2011 | Similar age | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SZ-12 has outside dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the SZ-12 vs the GR Digital IV.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-12 and GR Digital IV is 89 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-12 and GR Digital IV.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SZ-12 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus SZ-12 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 390 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $350 | $599 |