Clicky

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
89
Imaging
37
Features
36
Overall
36
Olympus SZ-12 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus SZ-12
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SZ-12 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SZ-12 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") offer different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The SZ-12 was launched 4 months later than the GR Digital IV so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the SZ-12 scores against the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SZ-12 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus SZ-12

 GR Digital IV SZ-12 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen resolution1230k460kClearer screen (+770k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SZ-12 GR Digital IV 
IntroducedJanuary 2012September 2011Similar age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SZ-12 has outside dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

See the Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the SZ-12 vs the GR Digital IV.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-12 and GR Digital IV is 89 and 92 respectively.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-12 and GR Digital IV.

As you can see, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SZ-12 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus SZ-12 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SZ-12 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Portrait photography camera
33
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
41
has manual focus
saves RAW files
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SZ-12
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (226 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus SZ-12
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
40
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery power (220 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery (390 shots)
can't change focal length (28mm)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus SZ-12 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography highlights
65
lighter than average (226 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low battery power (220 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
67
good battery (390 shots)
built-in flash
great max aperture (f1.9)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SZ-12 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography features
40
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
low battery power (220 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
53
has manual focus
great max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
good battery (390 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus SZ-12
Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital IV
31
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than average (226g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone support
29
great max aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus SZ-12Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus SZ-12 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2012-01-10 2011-09-15
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-600mm (24.0x) 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/1.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 226 grams (0.50 pounds) 190 grams (0.42 pounds)
Physical dimensions 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 images 390 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-50B DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $350 $599