Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36


77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SZ-12 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly similar but the SZ-12 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

The SZ-12 was brought out 2 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the SZ-12 scores versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SZ-12 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-12 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
SZ-12 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 27 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus SZ-12
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
SZ-12 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-12 has physical dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SZ-12 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-12 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 89 and 77 respectively.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The image below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-12 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SZ-12 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus SZ-12 will offer more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern SZ-12 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $350 | $566 |