Clicky

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
89
Imaging
37
Features
36
Overall
36
Olympus SZ-12 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
51
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus SZ-12
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Revealed November 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SZ-12 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is fairly similar but the SZ-12 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SZ-12 was brought out 2 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the SZ-12 scores versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 SZ-12 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
RevealedJanuary 2012November 2009Newer by 27 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus SZ-12

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro SZ-12 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display resolution920k460kCrisper display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 SZ-12 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-12 has physical dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Look at the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SZ-12 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-12 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 89 and 77 respectively.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading specs. The image below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-12 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SZ-12 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus SZ-12 will offer more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern SZ-12 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus SZ-12
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
33
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
54
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
megapixel count low (12MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus SZ-12 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Street photography camera
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
61
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus SZ-12 Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography details
40
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery pack (220 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
31
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
has no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus SZ-12 Travel photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography info
65
lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
long reach (600mm)
no Timelapse function
low battery pack (220 per charge)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
49
built-in flash
not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SZ-12 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography features
40
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
low battery pack (220 per charge)
no Timelapse function
46
has manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus SZ-12
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
31
fairly wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone socket
20
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone port
Photography Glossary

Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus SZ-12Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus SZ-12 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2012-01-10 2009-11-10
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - GR engine III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-600mm (24.0x) 50mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 180 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 226 gr (0.50 pounds) 453 gr (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 photographs 320 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $350 $566