Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-30
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus SZ-12 versus Ricoh WG-30, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SZ-12 (14MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SZ-12 was released 3 years before the WG-30 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SZ-12 matches up against the WG-30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-12 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Ricoh WG-30
| SZ-12 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus SZ-12
| WG-30 | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 | January 2012 | More recent by 33 months |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh WG-30
| SZ-12 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SZ-12 enjoys physical dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SZ-12 versus Ricoh WG-30 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SZ-12 against the WG-30.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-12 and WG-30 is 89 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The visual underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-12 and WG-30.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-30 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older SZ-12 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) | 192 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $350 | $428 |