Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SZ-12 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SZ-12 was released 3 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SZ-12 scores against the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-12 & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-12 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Ricoh WG-4
| SZ-12 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus SZ-12
| WG-4 | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | January 2012 | Fresher by 25 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh WG-4
| SZ-12 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | The same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-12 comes with exterior dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the SZ-12 versus the WG-4.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the SZ-12 and WG-4 is 89 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by going through technical specs. The visual below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-12 and WG-4.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 to show more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older SZ-12 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226g (0.50 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $330 |