Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SZ-12 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SZ-12 was revealed 3 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SZ-12 scores vs the WG-4 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-12 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-12 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| SZ-12 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus SZ-12
| WG-4 GPS | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | January 2012 | Fresher by 25 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| SZ-12 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus SZ-12 has outer dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the SZ-12 against the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-12 and WG-4 GPS is 89 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-12 and WG-4 GPS.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to give you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older SZ-12 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $210 |