Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Updated by Ricoh WG-6
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Olympus SZ-12 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SZ-12 (14MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is pretty similar and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SZ-12 was revealed 4 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the SZ-12 scores versus the WG-5 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-12 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-12 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| SZ-12 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus SZ-12
| WG-5 GPS | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 | January 2012 | More recent by 37 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| SZ-12 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-12 provides outside measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SZ-12 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the SZ-12 compared to the WG-5 GPS.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-12 and WG-5 GPS is 89 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SZ-12 and WG-5 GPS.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older SZ-12 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SZ-12 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SZ-12 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 14.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) | 236 grams (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $350 | $500 |