Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8df78/8df78639e31f6f9cab0cd6bb2ccb49100f8299fb" alt="Olympus SZ-12 front Olympus SZ-12 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47f7d/47f7d7b1e27877de843384ed6303648cfc08aee4" alt="Samsung HZ35W front Samsung HZ35W front"
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Additionally Known as WB650
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus SZ-12 versus Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SZ-12 (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SZ-12 was introduced 20 months later than the HZ35W which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SZ-12 grades vs the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-12 and Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-12 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Samsung HZ35W
SZ-12 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus SZ-12
HZ35W | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-12 and Samsung HZ35W
SZ-12 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SZ-12 provides physical measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SZ-12 versus Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the SZ-12 and the HZ35W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a71e/5a71e37b282b00c3c60a77df7fd5b1262cd626f5" alt="Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SZ-12 and HZ35W is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aed3/7aed34adb56a861e8d26ba3e350f932b80257676" alt="Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-12 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus SZ-12 to offer you extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent SZ-12 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dfd4/9dfd4d29ac1109462cb4fdf730c94f20f1cf40b3" alt="Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2853c/2853c5769728c162e6716d79dadbb0c5a086bd16" alt="Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SZ-12 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus SZ-12 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus SZ-12 | Samsung HZ35W |
Alternative name | - | WB650 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 226 gr (0.50 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $350 | $300 |