Olympus SZ-15 vs Panasonic FZ2500
88 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus SZ-15 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Released September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus SZ-15 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus SZ-15 and Panasonic FZ2500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the SZ-15 (16MP) and the FZ2500 (20MP) is very comparable but the SZ-15 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SZ-15 was launched 4 years prior to the FZ2500 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SZ-15 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the SZ-15 scores against the FZ2500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SZ-15 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-15 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-15 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-15 over the Panasonic FZ2500
SZ-15 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus SZ-15
FZ2500 | SZ-15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | June 2013 | Newer by 39 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-15 and Panasonic FZ2500
SZ-15 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Olympus SZ-15 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SZ-15 comes with external measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has proportions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") accompanied by a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SZ-15 and Panasonic FZ2500 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the SZ-15 versus the FZ2500.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SZ-15 and FZ2500 is 88 and 53 respectively.
Olympus SZ-15 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The image here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SZ-15 and FZ2500.
All in all, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SZ-15 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged SZ-15 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus SZ-15 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SZ-15 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus SZ-15 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus SZ-15 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-06-21 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | AVI MPEG4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 250 grams (0.55 lb) | 915 grams (2.02 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-10A | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $200 | $998 |