Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II
88 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de070/de070c57f70c18cca33e66ee5f72e095cd443e26" alt="Olympus SZ-15 front Olympus SZ-15 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/697bb/697bb1cdcdb77b7647f93783faecc3a3a6424bc9" alt="Ricoh GR II front Ricoh GR II front"
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh GR
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus SZ-15 versus Ricoh GR II, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SZ-15 (16MP) and the GR II (16MP) is fairly comparable but the SZ-15 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SZ-15 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the GR II making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SZ-15 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SZ-15 scores against the GR II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SZ-15 & Ricoh GR II. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-15 Gallery & Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-15 over the Ricoh GR II
SZ-15 | GR II |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus SZ-15
GR II | SZ-15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | ![]() | June 2013 | Fresher by 24 months |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-15 and Ricoh GR II
SZ-15 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SZ-15 enjoys exterior dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SZ-15 versus Ricoh GR II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the SZ-15 compared to the GR II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac2cc/ac2ccafc6db242fd1133192b5335127220aa5231" alt="Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-15 and GR II is 88 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a4ee/6a4ee379f9e3e69da24abd7b9b390a5c096f100a" alt="Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-15 and GR II.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The SZ-15 includes the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF harder. The older SZ-15 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b517/6b517c1fa938355e9b685b42526bbb4cf39d6458" alt="Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85a3c/85a3c9e70a4f3513bc57afe0877a52b49134bed5" alt="Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SZ-15 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Olympus SZ-15 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus SZ-15 | Ricoh GR II |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-06-21 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 300 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | AVI MPEG4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 250g (0.55 lb) | 251g (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-10A | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $200 | $599 |