Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus 9000
89 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus 9000 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus 9000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SZ-16 iHS was introduced 3 years later than the 9000 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SZ-16 iHS scores vs the 9000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-16 iHS & Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus 9000
| SZ-16 iHS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 45 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| 9000 | SZ-16 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Olympus 9000
| SZ-16 iHS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS comes with physical measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus 9000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SZ-16 iHS compared to the 9000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-16 iHS and 9000 is 89 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-16 iHS and 9000.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to offer more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer SZ-16 iHS should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also Known as | - | mju 9000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-08 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226g (0.50 pounds) | 225g (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $230 | $300 |
