Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SZ-16 iHS was released 3 years after the Tough-3000 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the SZ-16 iHS scores versus the Tough-3000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus Tough-3000
SZ-16 iHS | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
Tough-3000 | SZ-16 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Olympus Tough-3000
SZ-16 iHS | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS has got external measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the SZ-16 iHS compared to the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5257b/5257b4a8dbdfef776b3c828ac470f325c61de0de" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-16 iHS and Tough-3000 is 89 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95052/950521f1f10f83ce3e333d6f6b1f4e3a5696e16d" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The pic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SZ-16 iHS and Tough-3000.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The younger SZ-16 iHS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/183ba/183ba736d4b3774938ec1cd0a1ba998a843c73e8" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7267/f7267fd76e9719ae4cafb47c60982b7a7bea3838" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Alternate name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $230 | $0 |