Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus TG-320
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SZ-16 iHS was announced 13 months after the TG-320 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SZ-16 iHS scores vs the TG-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-16 iHS & Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus TG-320
| SZ-16 iHS | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | January 2012 | More modern by 13 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| TG-320 | SZ-16 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Olympus TG-320
| SZ-16 iHS | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS features exterior measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the SZ-16 iHS versus the TG-320.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-16 iHS and TG-320 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SZ-16 iHS and TG-320.
As you can see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to produce extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern SZ-16 iHS will have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-01-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226g (0.50 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | 150 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $230 | $0 |