Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Panasonic FX75
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
94 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Announced June 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Panasonic FX75, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SZ-16 iHS was revealed 2 years later than the FX75 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SZ-16 iHS grades versus the FX75 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Panasonic FX75
| SZ-16 iHS | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| FX75 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Panasonic FX75
| SZ-16 iHS | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS has external dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Panasonic FX75 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the SZ-16 iHS versus the FX75.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SZ-16 iHS and FX75 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The graphic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-16 iHS and FX75.
Plainly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to deliver more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger SZ-16 iHS provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-08 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226g (0.50 lb) | 165g (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $230 | $139 |