Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Panasonic TS25

Below is a extensive assessment of the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Panasonic TS25, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the TS25 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The SZ-16 iHS was brought out around the same time to the TS25 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the SZ-16 iHS grades against the TS25 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Panasonic TS25 Gallery.

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS features physical dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Panasonic TS25 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Panasonic TS25 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SZ-16 iHS vs the TS25.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-16 iHS and TS25 is 89 and 95 respectively.

Quite often, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The photograph here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-16 iHS and TS25.

Plainly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP therefore you should expect similar quality of files however you would want to factor the release date of the products into consideration.