Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh G900
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh G900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SZ-16 iHS was released 6 years prior to the G900 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the SZ-16 iHS scores vs the G900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-16 iHS & Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Ricoh G900
| SZ-16 iHS | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| G900 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 | January 2013 | More modern by 62 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Ricoh G900
| SZ-16 iHS | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS has got outside measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has proportions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh G900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SZ-16 iHS vs the G900.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-16 iHS and G900 is 89 and 89 respectively.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The image here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SZ-16 iHS and G900.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh G900 to produce extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged SZ-16 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Ricoh G900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 340 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $230 | $752 |