Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-20
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-20, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SZ-16 iHS was unveiled 13 months prior to the WG-20 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the SZ-16 iHS grades against the WG-20 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-16 iHS & Ricoh WG-20. The full galleries are available at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Ricoh WG-20
| SZ-16 iHS | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| WG-20 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | January 2013 | More recent by 13 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Ricoh WG-20
| SZ-16 iHS | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS provides outer dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-20 has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-20 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SZ-16 iHS against the WG-20.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-16 iHS and WG-20 is 89 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-16 iHS and WG-20.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to render extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older SZ-16 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) | 164 grams (0.36 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | 260 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $230 | $370 |