Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df4a/5df4a7bd7b9b88dd2f51805c9d7765d7c23b749f" alt="Ricoh WG-70 front Ricoh WG-70 front"
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Successor is Ricoh WG-80
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Ricoh WG-70, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The SZ-16 iHS was unveiled 8 years prior to the WG-70 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SZ-16 iHS scores against the WG-70 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-16 iHS & Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are available at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Ricoh WG-70
SZ-16 iHS | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
WG-70 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 86 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Ricoh WG-70
SZ-16 iHS | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS comes with exterior dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Ricoh WG-70 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the SZ-16 iHS compared to the WG-70.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9181/c9181ec555e3fa4c6aaa32b3024eac975538036b" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-16 iHS and WG-70 is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f2f8/8f2f8281801c161d4cfa392df25003287978bb5d" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-16 iHS and WG-70.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of images although you will want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged SZ-16 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18296/1829659ada62dda70d71bf25af6e371d206a1a3e" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03cc8/03cc8ed8b26a3518fc9be66e79d8cd1f4e37f045" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Ricoh WG-70 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2020-02-04 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 300 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $230 | $280 |