Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SZ-16 iHS was brought out 20 months before the WG-M1 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the SZ-16 iHS scores vs the WG-M1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SZ-16 iHS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| WG-M1 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 | January 2013 | More modern by 20 months |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Ricoh WG-M1
| SZ-16 iHS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS has outside dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the SZ-16 iHS versus the WG-M1.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-16 iHS and WG-M1 is 89 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-16 iHS and WG-M1.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to result in greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SZ-16 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226g (0.50 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $230 | $2,000 |