Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Also Known as WB650
Photography Glossary Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SZ-16 iHS was announced 2 years later than the HZ35W and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the SZ-16 iHS matches up versus the HZ35W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Samsung HZ35W
| SZ-16 iHS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | June 2010 | Fresher by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| HZ35W | SZ-16 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Clearer display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Samsung HZ35W
| SZ-16 iHS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS comes with outside dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Samsung HZ35W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SZ-16 iHS against the HZ35W.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-16 iHS and HZ35W is 89 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The visual here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-16 iHS and HZ35W.
All in all, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to give you greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent SZ-16 iHS provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also Known as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $230 | $300 |