Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung SL102
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SZ-16 iHS was announced 4 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the SZ-16 iHS scores vs the SL102 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Samsung SL102
| SZ-16 iHS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | January 2009 | Fresher by 49 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
| SL102 | SZ-16 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Samsung SL102
| SZ-16 iHS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS comes with outer measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the SZ-16 iHS compared to the SL102.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-16 iHS and SL102 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The visual below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SZ-16 iHS and SL102.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to result in greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger SZ-16 iHS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $230 | $130 |