Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350
89 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
![Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SZ-16-iHS/Olympus-SZ-16-iHS-front.jpg)
![Samsung TL350 front Samsung TL350 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-TL350/Samsung-TL350-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Other Name is WB2000
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Samsung TL350, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The SZ-16 iHS was launched 2 years later than the TL350 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the SZ-16 iHS grades versus the TL350 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-16 iHS & Samsung TL350. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Samsung TL350
SZ-16 iHS | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
TL350 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Samsung TL350
SZ-16 iHS | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS comes with outer measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SZ-16 iHS versus Samsung TL350 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the SZ-16 iHS vs the TL350.
![Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SZ-16-iHS-vs-Samsung-TL350-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-16 iHS and TL350 is 89 and 94 respectively.
![Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SZ-16-iHS-vs-Samsung-TL350-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The visual here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-16 iHS and TL350.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus SZ-16 iHS to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent SZ-16 iHS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-SZ-16-iHS-vs-Samsung-TL350-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-SZ-16-iHS-vs-Samsung-TL350-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Samsung TL350 |
Also called as | - | WB2000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-01-08 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) | 195 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $230 | $400 |