Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Announced July 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sony A200, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The SZ-16 iHS was announced 4 years later than the A200 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the SZ-16 iHS matches up vs the A200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Sony A200
SZ-16 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2008 | Fresher by 55 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
A200 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sony A200
SZ-16 iHS | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS has exterior dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sony A200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the SZ-16 iHS versus the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e26e8/e26e8c9570fc64b4b010bf2d009b5ca18323fff3" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-16 iHS and A200 is 89 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25c31/25c3194db040a10ea9645aa2dc2400b272773e5f" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching specs. The visual below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-16 iHS and A200.
All in all, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SZ-16 iHS using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS will render more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer SZ-16 iHS should have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20d16/20d16a638341fa5b3e1cf9c21d416c43d94f9dfa" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9c83/b9c83f8f255890808b6f5a112347abe715c97554" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lb) | 572 grams (1.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $230 | $100 |