Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sony NEX-C3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the NEX-C3 (16MP) is very comparable but the SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The SZ-16 iHS was announced 17 months after the NEX-C3 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the SZ-16 iHS scores against the NEX-C3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-16 iHS & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Sony NEX-C3
SZ-16 iHS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
NEX-C3 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sony NEX-C3
SZ-16 iHS | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS provides physical dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sony NEX-C3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SZ-16 iHS against the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/302fb/302fb6cad4948e2ee28ce3dedd95ee5ae7a5cfc9" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SZ-16 iHS and NEX-C3 is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5104d/5104d73281f552397163877e5c8064f4b9e79ee1" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The image here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-16 iHS and NEX-C3.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature the identical MP but different sensor dimensions. The SZ-16 iHS uses the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallower DOF trickier. The younger SZ-16 iHS provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69a12/69a129f05b373d19e3624dde3a7a4d278a13cb81" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/deb1d/deb1d8c88fe1cf537559e7677eac6d1130e4279a" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | 400 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $230 | $343 |