Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a4a1/1a4a1e9ae5851412bf5c0adc402e8817737aa48f" alt="Sony SLT-A35 front Sony SLT-A35 front"
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sony A35, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the A35 (16MP) is fairly similar but the SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") and A35 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SZ-16 iHS was revealed 16 months after the A35 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SZ-16 iHS scores versus the A35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sony SLT-A35. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery and Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Sony A35
SZ-16 iHS | A35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | Newer by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
A35 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sony A35
SZ-16 iHS | A35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS enjoys outside dimensions of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony A35 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SZ-16 iHS and Sony A35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the SZ-16 iHS and the A35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92da8/92da874c816ec6c1faf6374ef559404ea03d881f" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-16 iHS and A35 is 89 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68ac9/68ac9d91523248498cf8a7575519d5ec267cd343" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over specs. The picture underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-16 iHS and A35.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have the same megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The SZ-16 iHS includes the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher. The more recent SZ-16 iHS should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cb18/8cb18a1de3c2109185d0537c9471fac1a16169e7" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f50/e3f50c3528858e3f5a94fa05743bb6864960044d" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SZ-16 iHS vs Sony A35 Specifications
Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Sony SLT-A35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | Sony SLT-A35 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2011-09-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226g (0.50 lb) | 415g (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 763 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 440 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $230 | $598 |