Olympus SZ-30MR vs Ricoh WG-30W
89 Imaging
38 Features
39 Overall
38
91 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced March 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SZ-30MR vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus SZ-30MR vs Ricoh WG-30W, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SZ-30MR (16MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SZ-30MR was launched 4 years earlier than the WG-30W which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the SZ-30MR scores vs the WG-30W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SZ-30MR vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-30MR and Ricoh WG-30W. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-30MR Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-30MR over the Ricoh WG-30W
| SZ-30MR | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus SZ-30MR
| WG-30W | SZ-30MR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2014 | March 2011 | Newer by 43 months |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-30MR and Ricoh WG-30W
| SZ-30MR | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SZ-30MR provides physical measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30W has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus SZ-30MR vs Ricoh WG-30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SZ-30MR versus the WG-30W.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-30MR and WG-30W is 89 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The pic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-30MR and WG-30W.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of photos though you need to take the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged SZ-30MR will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Olympus SZ-30MR | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SZ-30MR | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-03-02 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $279 | $280 |