Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35
89 Imaging
39 Features
39 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/153be/153bee67a3de8b34d60d9df4ae954e556a9475c8" alt="Olympus SZ-30MR front Olympus SZ-30MR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a4a1/1a4a1e9ae5851412bf5c0adc402e8817737aa48f" alt="Sony SLT-A35 front Sony SLT-A35 front"
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Revealed March 2011
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SZ-30MR (16MP) and the A35 (16MP) is relatively well matched but the SZ-30MR (1/2.3") and A35 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SZ-30MR was released 6 months earlier than the A35 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus SZ-30MR being a Compact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SZ-30MR scores against the A35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SZ-30MR & Sony SLT-A35. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-30MR Gallery & Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-30MR over the Sony A35
SZ-30MR | A35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus SZ-30MR
A35 | SZ-30MR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-30MR and Sony A35
SZ-30MR | A35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2011 | ![]() | September 2011 | Similar age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus SZ-30MR provides physical dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony A35 has proportions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the SZ-30MR and the A35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b13c0/b13c0aa308ee7e3db1cc349dbbf3c42161fdbad6" alt="Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 size comparison Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-30MR and A35 is 89 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a039/2a0394c27398400490493f9de3f26db657aa0240" alt="Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at specs. The photograph below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-30MR and A35.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The SZ-30MR provides the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field more difficult.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55746/557469b76a7ed99ed8fffec528ecee3068741ce7" alt="Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5127/e5127966751a2102e13e6787a969b605f6254ecc" alt="Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Sony A35 Specifications
Olympus SZ-30MR | Sony SLT-A35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus SZ-30MR | Sony SLT-A35 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-03-02 | 2011-09-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) | 415 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | 440 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $279 | $598 |