Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Olympus TG-4
Portability
89 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
89 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2012
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- New Model is Olympus TG-5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS and Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the SZ-31MR iHS (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is very close and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SZ-31MR iHS was manufactured 4 years before the TG-4 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the SZ-31MR iHS scores versus the TG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SZ-31MR iHS and Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-31MR iHS over the Olympus TG-4
| SZ-31MR iHS | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
| TG-4 | SZ-31MR iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 38 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS and Olympus TG-4
| SZ-31MR iHS | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SZ-31MR iHS offers outer dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS and Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the SZ-31MR iHS vs the TG-4.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-31MR iHS and TG-4 is 89 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The photograph below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SZ-31MR iHS and TG-4.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP and you should expect comparable quality of images however you would want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The older SZ-31MR iHS will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography advice
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has face detection focus
saves RAW formats
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers focus by touch
lighter than average (226 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors (247g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography advice
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (200 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
environment sealing
good battery (380 CIPA)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography factors
lighter than average (226 grams)
offers focus by touch
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
no Timelapse recording
terrible battery pack (200 per charge)
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
good battery (380 shots)
environment sealing
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competitors (247g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography factors
pretty wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
terrible battery pack (200 CIPA)
no Timelapse recording
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
good battery (380 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Vlogging info
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging info
pretty wide (25mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (226g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly screen
no external microphone port
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (247 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus SZ-31MR iHS | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SZ-31MR iHS | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Dual TruePic V | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Hypercrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.30 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 226g (0.50 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 pictures | 380 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $379 |