Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75
89 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b691/7b691009d510886867bf1f2a969ed881754c4ff5" alt="Olympus SZ-31MR iHS front Olympus SZ-31MR iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the SZ-31MR iHS (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SZ-31MR iHS was manufactured 21 months after the FX75 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SZ-31MR iHS grades versus the FX75 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SZ-31MR iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-31MR iHS over the Panasonic FX75
SZ-31MR iHS | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 21 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
FX75 | SZ-31MR iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS and Panasonic FX75
SZ-31MR iHS | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-31MR iHS has got outer dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
See the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the SZ-31MR iHS and the FX75.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f742/1f742a3b250761dd8725d6303d1e69f21bcd104b" alt="Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SZ-31MR iHS and FX75 is 89 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4a1d/a4a1d93d03b1bf56a30dfe2a8641e2f40eedc5ac" alt="Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The image below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SZ-31MR iHS and FX75.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS to deliver extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The newer SZ-31MR iHS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c08e/8c08e6201d4ac4cf8792e0532dd8fb608b9c380a" alt="Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7afd1/7afd1018d97de8def64839e45ecb25d81096604f" alt="Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus SZ-31MR iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2010-06-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic V | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Hypercrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.30 m | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $139 |