Clicky

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
89
Imaging
39
Features
47
Overall
42
Olympus SZ-31MR iHS front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
51
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
  • Introduced February 2012
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Released November 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the SZ-31MR iHS (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the SZ-31MR iHS (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The SZ-31MR iHS was introduced 2 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SZ-31MR iHS grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-31MR iHS over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 SZ-31MR iHS GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
ReleasedFebruary 2012November 2009Fresher by 28 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro SZ-31MR iHS 
Manually focus Very exact focus

Common features in the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 SZ-31MR iHS GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Screen resolution920k920kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus SZ-31MR iHS has exterior measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

See the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the SZ-31MR iHS versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SZ-31MR iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 89 and 77 respectively.

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SZ-31MR iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

All in all, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SZ-31MR iHS with its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus SZ-31MR iHS will provide greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern SZ-31MR iHS will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus SZ-31MR iHS
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
34
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
54
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
megapixel count low (12MP)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Street photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography highlights
64
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides focus via touch
lighter than competition (226g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Sports photography advice
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography advice
44
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (200 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect AF
31
good sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
does not have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
bad battery pack (320 CIPA)
does not have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Travel photography advice
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography advice
67
lighter than competition (226 grams)
provides focus via touch
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
missing Timelapse function
not so great battery (200 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
49
flash built-in
bad battery pack (320 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Landscape photography details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography details
41
rather wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
not so great battery (200 per charge)
missing Timelapse function
46
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
bad battery pack (320 per charge)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Vlogging details
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging details
35
rather wide (25mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (226g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone support
20
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SZ-31MR iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus SZ-31MR iHSRicoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus SZ-31MR iHS Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2012-02-08 2009-11-10
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Dual TruePic V GR engine III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-600mm (24.0x) 50mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/2.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology Hypercrystal III TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 180s
Max shutter speed 1/1700s 1/3200s
Continuous shutter rate 7.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.30 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 226 grams (0.50 lbs) 453 grams (1.00 lbs)
Physical dimensions 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 images 320 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail price $0 $566