Olympus 1 vs Samsung HZ35W
79 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus 1 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 402g - 116 x 87 x 57mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Successor is Olympus 1s
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 1 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus 1 and Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 1 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very similar but the 1 (1/1.7") and HZ35W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 1 was introduced 3 years after the HZ35W which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the 1 matches up against the HZ35W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 1 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 1 and Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 1 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 1 over the Samsung HZ35W
| 1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 | June 2010 | Newer by 42 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 614k | Sharper display (+426k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus 1
| HZ35W | 1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus 1 and Samsung HZ35W
| 1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus 1 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 1 has outer dimensions of 116mm x 87mm x 57mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.2") along with a weight of 402 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 1 and Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the 1 vs the HZ35W.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 1 and HZ35W is 79 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 1 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The image below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 1 and HZ35W.
To sum up, both cameras offer the same exact resolution but different sensor dimensions. The 1 has the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler. The fresher 1 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 1 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 1 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 1 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 1 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also Known as | - | WB650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-11-25 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-on, off, redeye reduction slow sync, full, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high speed: 640 x 480 (120p), 320 x 240 (240p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 402 gr (0.89 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 87 x 57mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 51 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.6 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 410 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $700 | $300 |