Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3
79 Imaging
38 Features
66 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e543d/e543d07bc0aeca4121d46d0cb23e8f7ef7a789d0" alt="Olympus Stylus 1s front Olympus Stylus 1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b47f9/b47f930de28b117873fba531eee680f0fd88065c" alt="Ricoh CX3 front Ricoh CX3 front"
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 402g - 116 x 87 x 57mm
- Released April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus 1
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the 1s (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is very comparable but the 1s (1/1.7") and CX3 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The 1s was manufactured 4 years later than the CX3 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 1s being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the 1s scores vs the CX3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 1s and Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 1s Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 1s over the Ricoh CX3
1s | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2015 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 59 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus 1s
CX3 | 1s |
---|
Common features in the Olympus 1s and Ricoh CX3
1s | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus 1s features physical measurements of 116mm x 87mm x 57mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.2") with a weight of 402 grams (0.89 lbs) and the Ricoh CX3 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the 1s against the CX3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7af28/7af283cb8faefb003849b6eea4afa1abd69db660" alt="Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 1s and CX3 is 79 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68215/682159712d8cb72b0ac875e8ceae92e2b6eba4cd" alt="Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 1s and CX3.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The 1s featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus 1s will show more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The fresher 1s provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17bdc/17bdc7179a3ce704fc8294ee6c7cda06e7f95418" alt="Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/748fa/748faa23fa4988b4fe355b134808ababa62eccdd" alt="Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 1s | Ricoh CX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus 1s | Ricoh CX3 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-04-13 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.30 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-on, off, redeye reduction slow sync, full, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 402 grams (0.89 pounds) | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 87 x 57mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 450 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $699 | $329 |