Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX4
79 Imaging
37 Features
66 Overall
48
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 402g - 116 x 87 x 57mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus 1
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus 1s versus Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the 1s (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the 1s (1/1.7") and CX4 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 1s was revealed 4 years after the CX4 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 1s being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the 1s grades versus the CX4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 1s and Ricoh CX4. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 1s Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 1s over the Ricoh CX4
| 1s | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 | August 2010 | More modern by 57 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus 1s
| CX4 | 1s |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus 1s and Ricoh CX4
| 1s | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 1s comes with outside dimensions of 116mm x 87mm x 57mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.2") with a weight of 402 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus 1s versus Ricoh CX4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the 1s compared to the CX4.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the 1s and CX4 is 79 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out specs. The pic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 1s and CX4.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The 1s having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus 1s will provide more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher 1s is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 1s vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 1s | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 1s | Ricoh CX4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.30 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-on, off, redeye reduction slow sync, full, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 402g (0.89 pounds) | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 87 x 57mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.2") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 450 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $699 | $211 |