Olympus 5010 vs Panasonic FX75
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus 5010 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also Known as mju 5010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus 5010 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus 5010 vs Panasonic FX75, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 5010 (14MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 5010 was manufactured 4 months prior to the FX75 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the 5010 scores against the FX75 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations Olympus 5010 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 5010 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 5010 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Panasonic FX75
| 5010 | FX75 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus 5010
| FX75 | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 5010 and Panasonic FX75
| 5010 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | June 2010 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus 5010 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 5010 enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has specifications of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 5010 vs Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the 5010 against the FX75.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 5010 and FX75 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 5010 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The graphic below may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 5010 and FX75.
All in all, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP and you can expect comparable quality of pictures however you would want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
Olympus 5010 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 5010 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 5010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 5010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Alternate name | mju 5010 | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2010-06-01 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126 gr (0.28 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $150 | $139 |
