Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh WG-4
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju 5010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh WG-4, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the 5010 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively close and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 5010 was brought out 5 years before the WG-4 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the 5010 grades vs the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 5010 and Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 5010 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Ricoh WG-4
| 5010 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus 5010
| WG-4 | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | January 2010 | More modern by 49 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 5010 and Ricoh WG-4
| 5010 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 5010 has got external measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the 5010 and the WG-4.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 5010 and WG-4 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 5010 and WG-4.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 to result in greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged 5010 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 5010 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 5010 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Also called as | mju 5010 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126g (0.28 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $150 | $330 |