Olympus 5010 vs Sony H200
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus 5010 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju 5010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Revealed January 2013
Olympus 5010 vs Sony H200 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus 5010 versus Sony H200, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the 5010 (14MP) and H200 (20MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 5010 was announced 4 years before the H200 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the 5010 grades vs the H200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 5010 vs Sony H200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 5010 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 5010 Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Sony H200
5010 | H200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus 5010
H200 | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 5010 and Sony H200
5010 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus 5010 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 5010 enjoys external measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has sizing of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 5010 versus Sony H200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the 5010 against the H200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 5010 and H200 is 96 and 67 respectively.
Olympus 5010 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The pic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 5010 and H200.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Sony H200 to give extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged 5010 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 5010 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 5010 vs Sony H200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 5010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 5010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Also referred to as | mju 5010 | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 2920 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 20cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 6.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 126 grams (0.28 pounds) | 530 grams (1.17 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Battery format | - | AA |
Battery ID | Li-50B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $150 | $250 |