Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
![Olympus Stylus 5010 front Olympus Stylus 5010 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-5010/Olympus-5010-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W620/Sony-W620-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju 5010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
- 116g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
- Launched January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus 5010 versus Sony W620, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the 5010 (14MP) and the W620 (14MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The 5010 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the W620 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony W620 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the 5010 scores versus the W620 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 5010 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 5010 Gallery and Sony W620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Sony W620
5010 | W620 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony W620 over the Olympus 5010
W620 | 5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 24 months |
Common features in the Olympus 5010 and Sony W620
5010 | W620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 5010 features external dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony W620 has dimensions of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 5010 versus Sony W620 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the 5010 against the W620.
![Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 size comparison Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-5010-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W620-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the 5010 and W620 is 96 and 96 respectively.
![Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 top view buttons comparison Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-5010-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W620-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 5010 and W620.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of images however you should factor the production date of the products into consideration. The older 5010 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
![Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 sensor size comparison Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-Stylus-5010-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W620-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-5010-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W620-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 5010 vs Sony W620 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 5010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 5010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 |
Also called | mju 5010 | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 126 grams (0.28 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $150 | $102 |