Olympus 550WP vs Olympus 6020
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Other Name is mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 550WP vs Olympus 6020 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus 550WP vs Olympus 6020, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the 550WP (10MP) and 6020 (13MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 550WP was revealed 13 months prior to the 6020 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the 550WP grades against the 6020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 550WP vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 550WP & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 550WP Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Olympus 6020
| 550WP | 6020 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus 550WP
| 6020 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 13 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Olympus 6020
| 550WP | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus 550WP comes with external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 550WP vs Olympus 6020 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the 550WP compared to the 6020.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 550WP and 6020 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the 550WP and 6020.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus 6020 to offer you extra detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged 550WP is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also called | mju 550WP | mju Tough 6020 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1/4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $399 | $279 |
