Olympus 550WP vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 550WP vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus 550WP and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the 550WP (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly comparable but the 550WP (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 550WP was unveiled 5 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the 550WP scores against the XZ-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 550WP vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 550WP and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 550WP Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| 550WP | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus 550WP
| XZ-2 iHS | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| 550WP | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 550WP enjoys exterior dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Olympus 550WP and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the 550WP against the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 550WP and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The image here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the 550WP and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 550WP having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will show extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 550WP will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Also called as | mju 550WP | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-07 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $450 |