Olympus 550WP vs Panasonic ZS200
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus 550WP vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus 550WP vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus 550WP versus Panasonic ZS200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the 550WP (10MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the 550WP (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") feature different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 550WP was introduced 10 years prior to the ZS200 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 550WP being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the 550WP scores vs the ZS200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 550WP vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 550WP and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 550WP Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Panasonic ZS200
550WP | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus 550WP
ZS200 | 550WP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | January 2009 | More recent by 110 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Panasonic ZS200
550WP | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus 550WP vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 550WP enjoys exterior dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 550WP versus Panasonic ZS200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the 550WP compared to the ZS200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 550WP and ZS200 is 94 and 86 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 550WP and ZS200.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The 550WP using its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Panasonic ZS200 will give you greater detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older 550WP is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 550WP vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 550WP vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 550WP | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also referred to as | mju 550WP | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lb) | 340 gr (0.75 lb) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $399 | $800 |