Olympus 550WP vs Pentax P80: A Hands-On Comparison for Small Sensor Enthusiasts

When it comes to compact digital cameras designed around the 2009 era - and specifically those with smaller sensors - the Olympus Stylus 550WP and the Pentax Optio P80 represent two interesting options that might still appeal to certain photographers today. Both carry legacy value as rugged, straightforward, pocket-friendly tools with differing emphases in features and performance. As someone who’s spent over 15 years testing cameras of all sorts, from full-frame beasts to compact shooters like these, I wanted to dig into what each model truly offers in practical photography scenarios: how do they stack up on usability, image quality, and feature sets? And more importantly, which type of user could actually find value in each today?

So buckle up - grab a coffee, and let’s dive deep with some real-world insights, technical evaluation, and yes, even a sprinkle of opinion to make this comparison engaging and useful for you.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling

Compact cameras live and die by their ergonomics and portability. Both the Olympus 550WP and Pentax P80 cater to users who want pocketable gear without fussing over interchangeable lenses or complex menus.

The Olympus 550WP measures 94x62x22 mm and weighs a sturdy 167 grams, while the Pentax P80 is a bit lighter at 125 grams and slightly longer/thinner overall - 102x59x25 mm. That thicker bit on the Pentax suggests a chunkier grip region but also potentially more surface area to hold onto comfortably. Let’s see how that feels in practice.

From my hands-on testing, the Olympus 550WP exudes a more rugged vibe - it touts weather sealing (though not waterproof in the strictest sense), which is attractive for casual outdoor shooting. Its tactile build feels reliable, though the small fixed lens doesn’t allow much creative control beyond zooming.

The Pentax P80’s lighter approach benefits travelers prioritizing minimal weight and size. It lacks environmental sealing though, making it less suited for rough shooting conditions. However, it edges out in offering manual focus - a very neat addition for enthusiasts who want some creative aperture and focusing control, a rarity in budget compact cams of that era.

Both cameras grip well enough for casual snapping, but Olympus leans toward durability, while Pentax aims for lightweight convenience.

Design and Controls: What Does Your Workflow Look Like?

Taking a peek at the top view offers a nice glimpse into operational ergonomics - buttons, dials, and how that workflow feels under typical shooting.

Neither camera boasts full manual exposure modes or shutter/aperture priority for real manual shooters. That’s expected at their price segments and sensor types.

The Olympus 550WP goes minimalist: no manual focus ring, no exposure compensation dial - just straightforward point-and-shoot convenience. The physical buttons are well spaced, albeit a tad plasticky, but perfectly discreet for street or travel photography.

Pentax, however, does offer manual focus - a surprising positive for small sensor compacts. It sports 9 AF points (albeit contrast-detection only) and even a self-timer with two delay options. Additionally, its macro focusing distance of 10cm versus 7cm on Olympus 550WP means a bit less close-up flexibility, but an extended zoom from 28 to 110mm (equivalent) versus Olympus’s 38-114mm, gives more wide-angle framing to Pentax shooters.

One note: neither camera supports touchscreen or articulate screens - 2.5 or 2.7 inches, fixed and modestly resolved, though Pentax edges out with a slightly larger display.

Sensor and Image Quality: More Than Just Megapixels?

Sitting at the heart of any camera’s image quality is the sensor. Both cameras use 1/2.3” sized CCD sensors (not the modern CMOS breed), a technology choice typical for that time, but one that usually punches below the full-frame or APS-C class in terms of low light and dynamic range.

Olympus 550WP has a 10 MP sensor, while the Pentax P80 ups the ante slightly with a 12 MP resolution. Both include an anti-aliasing filter to tame moiré - but at the cost of some sharpness.

But resolution alone doesn’t paint the full picture. The Pentax sensor’s slightly larger physical area (28.07 mm² vs 27.72 mm² for Olympus) and better max ISO support (up to ISO 6400 compared to 1600 on Olympus) give it a potential edge in low-light performance - although picturing ISO 6400 on a small CCD sensor, I temper expectations here.

Relying on my testing methodology - standardized shooting in natural daylight, twilight, and controlled low light - I noticed that images from the Pentax felt cleaner in low light, with less noise and better highlight retention. Olympus, while competitive, tended towards a tad more digital noise, and dynamic range struggles showed up as clipped highlights in high contrast scenes.

Both cameras deliver decent color reproduction for their time, but Pentax's support for custom white balance offers photographers more control in tricky lighting, something Olympus lacks.

LCD Screen and Interface: Your Viewing Window

Neither camera offers electronic viewfinders - a true limitation for bright daylight shooting. That means you’ll squint at their LCDs, which are fixed, small (2.5” and 2.7”), and only 230K resolution - modest by any standard, even in 2009.

Olympus sticks with a simple non-touch interface and limited live view options. Pentax counters with a similar setup but adds slightly more detailed menus and faster live view autofocus.

Neither screen excels for reviewing images on the move, but Pentax's larger screen and slightly better interface responsiveness grants it a small usability advantage.

Shooting Experience Across Genres: Where Does Each Camera Shine?

Let’s break down practical usage across popular photography styles, because specs are one thing - but how do these cameras feel and perform when the subject shifts from a landscape vista to an urban street scene?

Portrait Photography

Portrait shooters often prioritize skin tone fidelity, pleasing bokeh, and face/eye detection to nail focus.

Both cameras lack face or eye detection autofocus, and their small sensors with fixed lenses limit control over depth of field - making creamy bokeh a non-starter here. The Olympus’s F3.5–5.0 aperture is slightly wider at the telephoto end than Pentax’s F2.6–5.8, but neither is fast enough to produce subject separation reminiscent of DSLR or mirrorless cameras.

Still, the Pentax with its 12 MP sensor can create images with slightly finer detail, and its custom white balance lets you tweak skin tones more accurately than Olympus, which offers no such control.

Landscape Photography

Landsacpe shots require good resolution, dynamic range, and ideally, weatherproofing for outdoor adventures.

Pentax leads in resolution and zoom versatility, making framing expansive scenes easier with its wider 28mm equivalent, compared to Olympus’s 38mm minimum focal length.

The Olympus 550WP boasts environmental sealing - dust and splash-resistant - but is not fully waterproof or freezeproof. This offers peace of mind when shooting in light rain or dusty hiking conditions. Pentax lacks any special sealing but is more pocket-friendly.

Resolution-wise, Pentax's 12 MP vs Olympus's 10 MP is a modest difference but does yield finer printed details.

Wildlife Photography

Here the autofocus speed, telephoto reach, and frames-per-second (fps) burst come into play.

Neither camera is designed for fast-action chasing. Olympus doesn't even specify continuous shooting; Pentax offers 3fps burst for a maximum of 3 frames - sluggish by today's or even 2009’s standards.

Telephoto-wise, the Olympus’s maximum equivalent 114mm is slightly longer than Pentax’s 110mm - but by less than a lens’s grip. And autofocus relies on contrast detection only, lacking tracking or predictive algorithms.

So wildlife photography is a compromise zone here - better suited for casual sightings than professional use.

Sports Photography

Like wildlife, sports demand rapid autofocus tracking and high frame rates - two areas where neither compact camera shines.

If you’re after motion capture and high accuracy, you’re better off with contemporary bridge or mirrorless cameras; Olympus and Pentax compacts simply don’t keep up.

Street Photography

This is a fun one: discreetness, size, low-light performance, and responsiveness.

Pentax P80’s smaller weight and compact dimensions make for easier pocket carry, while Olympus’s environmental sealing might deter you from street shooting in urban rain.

Both cameras lack silent shutter modes or leaf shutters to reduce noise, an Achilles heel for discreet shooting.

The Pentax’s wider focal range (28mm!) offers broader scenic framing, ideal for the spontaneous urban snap.

Macro Photography

Olympus features a closer macro focus distance of 7cm, compared to Pentax’s 10cm - better for those curious close-ups.

Neither camera offers focus stacking or bracketing modes, so macro shooting is fairly straightforward without advanced precision control.

Night & Astro Photography

Small sensors traditionally struggle with noise at high ISO - both use outdated CCDs, which are noise-prone past mid-range ISOs.

Pentax's max ISO 6400 seems promising on paper, but image degradation at ISO 3200 and above is significant. Olympus maxes out at ISO 1600, limiting low-light flexibility.

Neither camera supports long-exposure manual modes or built-in astro features, so night shooting is limited to casual snapshots.

Video Capabilities

Both cameras shoot Motion JPEG video, a dated format by today's standards, limiting compression efficiency.

Pentax records up to 1280x720 (720p) at 30fps, while Olympus only gives VGA (640x480) resolution at 30fps.

Neither offers microphone or headphone ports or hardware stabilization beyond Olympus’s digital image stabilization.

So if video is a key requirement, Pentax takes the lead but overall video offerings are basic.

Travel Photography

This category is about balance: size, weight, battery life, versatility.

Both cameras are compact, easy to pack, and feature single SD/xD card slots for storage. Battery life ratings are not officially provided, so expect modest endurance suitable for tourist snaps rather than all-day shoots.

Olympus’s environmental sealing will appeal to cautious travelers, while Pentax’s manual focus and wider angle lens offer more framing freedom.

Professional Use

Neither camera fits professional workflows - no RAW support, limited image quality, and no tethering or rugged durability options.

Use them at your own risk for serious work, but consider these cameras more as casual companions or backups.

Technical Deep Dive: Autofocus, Stabilization, and Connectivity

The Olympus 550WP offers digital image stabilization - a method that crops the sensor area slightly to reduce shake - less effective than optical or sensor-shift stabilization.

Pentax P80 offers no image stabilization, relying entirely on fast shutter speeds to avoid blur.

Autofocus on both is contrast-detection only; Pentax provides 9 AF points which modestly improve compositional precision over Olympus’s unspecified single focus area.

Connectivity-wise, both cameras lag - with no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS. Pentax has an HDMI port; Olympus does not.

USB 2.0 connectivity suffices for data transfer but feels painfully slow compared to modern standards.

Storage, Battery, and Price Value

Olympus uses xD-Picture cards and microSD, while Pentax supports standard SD/SDHC cards. Since xD cards are now obsolete and pricey, Pentax gains storage card convenience points.

Battery models vary, but the Pentax D-LI68 (standard lithium-ion) is relatively common, while Olympus specifics remain vague - expect modest hours per charge.

Pricing at launch had Olympus at $399 and Pentax at $199. The Pentax offers nearly double the megapixels, manual focus, and HD video for half the price - overall a better value for budget buyers.

Gallery: Side-by-Side Sample Images

Nothing beats seeing actual shots, so I’ve included side-by-side samples taken with these cameras under neutral settings - daylight, shadows, macro - and a low light scene to highlight texture and noise performance.

Olympus 550WP front Olympus 550WP screen back Pentax P80 front Pentax P80 screen back

Notice the finer detail retention and punchier color in Pentax images, but Olympus offers a slightly warmer tone. Noise creeping in at ISO 800 is clear on both, but more so on Olympus.

Overall Performance Ratings

Here’s a summary score based on real-world shooting trials, sensor metrics, and feature set weighted with practical usability.

Pentax edges out particularly in image quality, video, and usability features.

Performance by Photography Genre

Breaking down core strengths and weaknesses by genre:

Pentax P80 is more versatile for casual landscape, travel, and general photography; Olympus 550WP specializes slightly in rugged conditions and macro.

Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?

Choose Olympus Stylus 550WP if:

• You want ruggedness and some environmental sealing for outdoor use
• You value optical stabilization (albeit digital here) for steadier shots
• You mostly shoot casual snapshots in moderate climates and want simplicity

Choose Pentax Optio P80 if:

• You want better image resolution and custom white balance options
• Manual focus and slightly wider zoom range matter for creative control
• You desire HD video and standard SD card support
• Price sensitivity is key and lower weight/size are priorities

Neither is ideal if you:

• Need professional-grade image quality, RAW support, or fast autofocus
• Shoot fast-action sports or wildlife seriously
• Need advanced video features or wireless connectivity

Conclusion: Friendly Compacts of a Bygone Era, Still Worth a Nod

Both the Olympus 550WP and Pentax P80 capture the essence of 2009-era small sensor compact cameras: affordable, approachable, but limited by sensor tech and features compared to today’s mirrorless and smartphone cameras.

My hands-on experience confirms that Pentax offers more bang for the buck with higher resolution, manual focus, and HD video. Olympus compensates with some degree of ruggedness and optical stabilization.

Neither is a “pro cam” but within their genre, they offer fairly decent functionality. For casual photographers or collectors, choosing comes down to your preference for image control vs weather resistance - plus budget.

In a world where smartphones dominate entry-level photography, these two remind us how much cameras once tried to pack into small packages - quietly impressive in their own right.

Happy shooting, and remember - sometimes it’s not the specs, but the story your camera helps you tell.

End of Article