Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RS1500
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
93 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RS1500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced March 2011
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RS1500 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus 550WP and Pentax RS1500, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the 550WP (10MP) and RS1500 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 550WP was released 3 years before the RS1500 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the 550WP matches up vs the RS1500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RS1500 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 550WP & Pentax Optio RS1500. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 550WP Gallery & Pentax RS1500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Pentax RS1500
550WP | RS1500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax RS1500 over the Olympus 550WP
RS1500 | 550WP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2011 | January 2009 | Fresher by 26 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Pentax RS1500
550WP | RS1500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RS1500 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 550WP has got external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Pentax RS1500 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 550WP and Pentax RS1500 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the 550WP vs the RS1500.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 550WP and RS1500 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RS1500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The photograph here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 550WP and RS1500.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Pentax RS1500 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older 550WP is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RS1500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 550WP vs Pentax RS1500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 550WP | Pentax Optio RS1500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Pentax Optio RS1500 |
Also called | mju 550WP | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2011-03-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) | 157 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $399 | $150 |