Clicky

Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Olympus Stylus 550WP front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Olympus 550WP
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
  • 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju 550WP
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Below, we are comparing the Olympus 550WP versus Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the 550WP (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The 550WP was launched 5 years before the WB800F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the 550WP scores against the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Samsung WB800F

 550WP WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus 550WP

 WB800F 550WP 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013January 2009More recent by 48 months
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Samsung WB800F

 550WP WB800F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus 550WP offers outer dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus 550WP versus Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the 550WP against the WB800F.

Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 550WP and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.

Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 550WP and WB800F.

As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older 550WP will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 550WP Portrait photography details
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography details
19
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
43
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus 550WP Street photography advice
Samsung WB800F Street photography advice
61
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (218 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus 550WP Sports photography factors
Samsung WB800F Sports photography factors
30
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
no shutter priority
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
52
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus 550WP Travel photography features
Samsung WB800F Travel photography features
55
weather proof
flash built-in
no Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than others in class (218 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 550WP Landscape photography info
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography info
30
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
no manual control
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse recording
49
focusing manually
pretty wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 550WP Vlogging details
Samsung WB800F Vlogging details
25
has image stabilization (Digital)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone support
35
pretty wide (23mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (218g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 550WP and Samsung WB800F
 Olympus Stylus 550WPSamsung WB800F
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus Stylus 550WP Samsung WB800F
Also called as mju 550WP -
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-01-07 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 38-114mm (3.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.0 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 7cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 167 grams (0.37 lb) 218 grams (0.48 lb)
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $399 $300