Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus 550WP versus Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the 550WP (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 550WP was launched 5 years before the WB800F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the 550WP scores against the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 550WP & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 550WP Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Samsung WB800F
550WP | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus 550WP
WB800F | 550WP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | January 2009 | More recent by 48 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Samsung WB800F
550WP | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus 550WP offers outer dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 550WP versus Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the 550WP against the WB800F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 550WP and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 550WP and WB800F.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older 550WP will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 550WP vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Olympus Stylus 550WP | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Samsung WB800F |
Also called as | mju 550WP | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-01-07 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 167 grams (0.37 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $399 | $300 |