Olympus Stylus 550WP vs. Sony Alpha A9: A Tale of Two Cameras from Different Worlds

If you handed me the Olympus Stylus 550WP and the Sony Alpha A9 and asked, “Which should I buy?” my first thought would be: Are you joking? These cameras are practically galaxies apart, launched nearly a decade apart, aimed at wildly different photographers. And yet, here we are - putting these two under the microscope for a head-to-head comparison because sometimes the journey between budget simplicity and pro-level tomfoolery is just as interesting as the destination.

Having extensively tested compact cameras especially for travel and casual shooting, and dialed in professional mirrorless setups for everything from sports to studio portraiture, I can confidently say: this comparison is less about who wins and more about understanding where each camera fits - and misses the mark - with real-world nuances.

Getting Acquainted: A Size and Ergonomics Reality Check

Let’s start with the obvious: physical presence and handling - a decisive factor in actual shooting enjoyment.

The Olympus 550WP, a small sensor compact camera from 2009, flaunts a petite, pebble-like shell designed for convenience and rough-use durability. It measures a mere 94 x 62 x 22 mm and weighs just 167 grams. On the other hand, the Sony A9 stands as a bulky, SLR-style mirrorless beast at 127 x 96 x 63 mm and 673 grams - roughly four times heavier.

The Olympus fits effortlessly in a jacket pocket or small purse, begging you to take it hiking, to festivals, or to the beach without a worry. Its buttons are tiny and simplified - there’s barely a dial in sight - which will please those who detest fiddly controls but frustrate anyone who craves manual nuance.

Sony’s A9, meanwhile, demands a dedicated camera bag, with a deep grip sculpted for one-handed shooting during adrenaline-pumping events. The heft here isn’t just bulk; it’s a sign of robust build and professional ergonomics, including customizable buttons and a weather-sealed magnesium alloy chassis designed to withstand tough conditions.

In short, this is compact convenience meets professional command.

Design and Control: Intuitive Simplicity vs. Professional Complexity

Moving to top-view design and button layout, we see clear philosophy differences.

The 550WP’s simple top plate has only a few buttons, no mode dial for aperture or shutter priority modes (because, well, it lacks them), and a fixed lens that means you won’t be swapping glass. There’s no dedicated shutter speed or ISO control, no exposure compensation, and manual focus is nonexistent.

Contrast that with the Sony A9’s sprawling set of dials, buttons, and joysticks - complete with a large mode dial, dual command dials for aperture and shutter speed, exposure compensation, AF mode selectors and more. Its touchscreen LCD adds another layer of ease for quick AF point selection or menu navigation.

If you like to craft your exposure with precision, the A9 puts control at your fingertips; the 550WP throws all that out the window for casual snapshots and “point-and-shoot” ease.

The Heart of the Matter: Sensor and Image Quality Breakdown

Now onto the component that defines the image quality gap: the sensor.

Olympus stuffs a 1/2.3” CCD sensor into the 550WP, clocking in at 10 megapixels. The sensor measures roughly 6.08 x 4.56 mm with a 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 aspect ratio support. Max native ISO is 1600, but brutal noise creeps in by ISO 800.

On the other side, the huge Sony A9 boasts a full-frame 35.6 x 23.8 mm BSI-CMOS sensor, delivering 24 megapixels at a 3:2 aspect ratio and max native ISO of 51200, expandable to an eye-boggling 204800. DxOMark places the A9 at an outstanding 92 overall score with exceptional color depth (24.9 bits), dynamic range (13.3 stops), and low-light ISO capabilities (ISO equivalent 3517).

What does this mean in practice? The Olympus sensor offers decent daylight image quality for casual use, but produces noisy, low-detail photos beyond ISO 400. Color depth and dynamic range are modest and definitely not for critical prints or professional work.

The Sony A9’s sensor is a playground for professionals - delivering crisp details, broad tonal latitude for editing, and superior noise control even at high ISO. Wildlife, sports, landscape, and event photographers rely on sensors like this for critical applications.

Looking Through the Lens: Autofocus and Shooting Performance

Autofocus can make or break any photographic opportunity, especially in dynamic situations.

The 550WP relies on basic contrast-detection AF with a single center point - no face detection, no eye AF, no continuous tracking. It lacks AF customization or multiple focus points, resulting in slow, often hunting autofocus especially in low light or moving subjects. There’s no continuous burst shooting mode, effectively removing it from serious action or wildlife shooting.

The Sony A9, in stunning contrast, features a blazing 693 phase-detect AF points covering a broad frame area, excellent real-time eye AF for humans and animals, and sophisticated subject tracking algorithms. Its AF system works at lightning speed and accuracy - even in challenging light.

Continuous shooting tops out at 20 frames per second - no blackouts - allowing sports and wildlife photographers to capture decisive moments with unparalleled precision.

Screen and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shot

Both cameras have LCDs but bear stark differences in quality and usability.

The Olympus 550WP offers a fixed, non-touch 2.5-inch LCD with a modest 230k-dot resolution - adequate for framing but borderline frustrating for reviewing images or navigating menus.

In comparison, Sony’s A9 sports a 3-inch tilting touchscreen boasting a razor-sharp 1.44 million dots - perfect for live view autofocus, quick composition tweaks and detailed image review.

The A9 also offers an advanced electronic viewfinder with 3.686 million-dot resolution, 100% coverage, and 0.78x magnification. This adds tactile confidence and clarity for professional shooters who prefer eye-level composing - especially in bright conditions where LCD visibility suffers.

Olympus doesn’t provide any EVF option, which may disappoint users wanting precise eyeball framing in bright environments.

Building for the Elements: Durability and Environmental Resistance

Both cameras claim weather sealing but with different scopes.

The Olympus 550WP is advertised as “environmentally sealed” (with shockproof, freezeproof, waterproof not supported), indicating some resistance to dust and light moisture. This makes it a decent companion for hiking or casual outdoor use without stressing over weather.

Sony’s A9, meanwhile, features true professional weather sealing designed to handle professional rigors - including dust resistance and moisture protection. Its magnesium alloy body lends toughness to a camera expected to perform day-in-day-out in targeted conditions such as sports arenas, outdoor wildlife shoots, or inclement weather assignments.

If you want a camera to toss in your backpack and trust against the elements on adventurous trips, both can do the job with varying degrees of confidence but the A9 is designed to endure much more demanding environments.

Exploring Photography Genres: Which Camera Excels Where?

Time to zoom out and see how each camera aligns with different photographic styles.

Olympus 550WP front Olympus 550WP screen back Sony A9 front Sony A9 screen back

Portrait Photography

The Olympus 550WP’s f/3.5-5.0 fixed zoom lens and small sensor produce modest bokeh - fine for snapshots but no silky background blur freedom. It lacks face or eye detection, so capturing tack-sharp eyes involves luck or steady hands and good lighting.

Sony’s A9 shines here with eye AF for humans and animals, the ability to switch lenses for fast primes with creamy bokeh, and wide dynamic range preserves exquisite skin tones even in tricky lighting.

Landscape Photography

No contest. The 550WP’s small sensor limits resolution and dynamic range, crucial for landscapes; plus the zoom range is very short for wide vistas.

The A9’s high resolution, large sensor area, and custom settings for exposure bracketing and RAW shooting are landscape-friendly. The weather sealing improves reliability on rough shoots.

Wildlife Photography

The Olympus camera’s slow autofocus, minimal zoom range, and lack of burst shooting mean missed wildlife moments are inevitable.

The Sony A9’s superb tracking AF, huge buffer, blazing 20fps shooting, and compatibility with serious telephoto lenses make it one of the best for wildlife pros and enthusiasts.

Sports Photography

The Olympus is simply inadequate here.

The Sony A9 was crafted for sports shooters needing zero-delay autofocus, silent shooting and frame rates to keep up with the action.

Street Photography

The Olympus 550WP scores points with its diminutive size and discreet profile, an asset for candid shots and urban exploration.

The A9, larger and more noticeable, demands more deliberate presence but delivers superior image quality and focusing accuracy. Some street shooters embrace this “big camera” look as part of their style.

Macro Photography

The Olympus’s 7cm macro focus distance and fixed zoom offer modest close-up ability but lack fine focusing controls.

The Sony enables macro with dedicated lenses, manual focus, focus peaking, and precision AF - the difference is like a toy hammer vs. a craftsman’s tool.

Night and Astrophotography

Small sensor noise and low ISO limits hamstring the Olympus at night.

In contrast, the A9’s incredible low-light performance, high ISO capabilities, and long exposure options create vivid, usable low light and astro shots.

Video Capabilities

The Olympus shoots VGA-quality (640 x 480) video with only basic frame rates - not cutting it for modern multimedia content.

Sony’s A9 can record 4K UHD at 30fps with options like microphone/headphone ports for quality sound, making it suitable for hybrid photo-video pros.

Travel Photography

Portability favors the Olympus, perfect for travelers prioritizing light packing and waterproof-ish durability.

The Sony is more cumbersome but offers versatile lens choices and professional features travelers who want unmatched image quality will appreciate.

Professional Work

The Olympus is not aimed at pro workflows: no RAW support, basic storage, and limited controls.

Sony’s A9 supports dual UHS-II SD cards, advanced file formats, extensive customizability, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth for fast tethering, and battery life of around 650 shots per charge - all vital for professional reliability and workflow.

Technical Insights: What the Numbers and Experience Reveal

• Image Stabilization: The Olympus 550WP uses digital stabilization, which is more like software gimbal assistance and can reduce sharpness. The Sony A9 features 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization, which genuinely improves handheld sharpness for photos and video.

• Battery Life: Sony’s A9 offers robust 650 shots per charge - surprisingly generous given the camera’s features. The Olympus specs don’t list battery life, but compact cameras around its era often manage 200-300 shots, assuming fresh batteries.

• Storage: The Olympus relies on xD-Picture Cards or microSD, increasingly obsolete and low capacity. Sony offers dual SD card slots with UHS-II support - crucial for professional burst shooting and backup.

• Connectivity: Olympus is offline - no wireless features. Sony includes Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, and HDMI/USB ports for tethering and streaming.

• Price to Performance: The Olympus 550WP was priced at around $400 at launch, targeting casual users wanting waterproof-ish durability. The contemporary A9 debuted near $4500, aimed squarely at professionals requiring cutting-edge speed and quality.

Verdict Time: Who Should Buy Which?

To put it bluntly: The Olympus Stylus 550WP is a casual snapshot machine meant for those who want a lightweight, rugged, no-fuss camera they can shove in a backpack and shoot on the go without worrying about settings. Ideal for hikers, beachgoers, and casual family photo dads who don’t want to lug heavy gear or wrestle with menus.

The Sony Alpha A9 is a powerhouse for professionals or serious enthusiasts who demand blistering autofocus, versatile lenses, stunning image quality, and comprehensive control over every shot. It is arguably one of the most competent mirrorless cameras on the market for sports, wildlife, event, and commercial work.

A huge gulf separates them - almost a decade of technology and target audience divide - but each shines in its respective niche.

Final Thoughts: Picking the Right Tool for the Job

In my years of photographing everything from weddings to wildlife, I’ve learned the best camera is the one that fits your vision - not only your budget.

If your priority is simplicity, ease, and casual robustness, the Olympus 550WP is a charming relic that still offers value today - especially if you find one at a bargain.

But if you demand precision, image fidelity, and the fastest autofocus the industry offers, the Sony A9 is a professional-grade instrument that requires investment - both in money and in mastering its complexities - to truly tame. Its strengths emerge in disciplined hands that crave the ultimate control and quality.

I recommend the Olympus for entry-level users and travelers wanting convenience, and the Sony A9 for pros or serious hobbyists shooting challenging subjects.

Sometimes it’s fun to compare polar opposites. The truth is, we need both the pocket-friendly adventurer and the hardcore pro rig in our photographic arsenal - each brings a unique story to frame.

Happy shooting, whatever you choose.

End of Article