Olympus 550WP vs Sony H200
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus 550WP vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
Olympus 550WP vs Sony H200 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus 550WP versus Sony H200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the 550WP (10MP) and H200 (20MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 550WP was introduced 5 years before the H200 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 550WP being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the 550WP matches up vs the H200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 550WP vs Sony H200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 550WP & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 550WP Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Sony H200
550WP | H200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus 550WP
H200 | 550WP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Sony H200
550WP | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus 550WP vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 550WP has outside measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 550WP versus Sony H200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the 550WP and the H200.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 550WP and H200 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The pic here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 550WP and H200.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony H200 to offer greater detail using its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged 550WP is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 550WP vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 550WP vs Sony H200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 550WP | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Other name | mju 550WP | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 2920 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 20cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 167g (0.37 lbs) | 530g (1.17 lbs) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Form of battery | - | AA |
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $399 | $250 |