Olympus 7000 vs Olympus TG-320
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus 7000 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-260mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 172g - 96 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Other Name is mju 7000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 7000 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Following is a extended comparison of the Olympus 7000 vs Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the 7000 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 7000 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the TG-320 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the 7000 grades vs the TG-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 7000 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 7000 and Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 7000 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7000 over the Olympus TG-320
| 7000 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus 7000
| TG-320 | 7000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
Common features in the Olympus 7000 and Olympus TG-320
| 7000 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus 7000 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus 7000 has outside measurements of 96mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 172 grams (0.38 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Olympus 7000 vs Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the 7000 compared to the TG-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 7000 and TG-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 7000 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the 7000 and TG-320.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to result in extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 7000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 7000 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 7000 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7000 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 7000 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Also called | mju 7000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-260mm (7.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 172 grams (0.38 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 56 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $280 | $0 |
