Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh GR
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
90 Imaging
56 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-260mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 172g - 96 x 56 x 25mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 7000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh GR Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus 7000 versus Ricoh GR, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the 7000 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the 7000 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 7000 was revealed 5 years earlier than the GR which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 7000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the 7000 matches up against the GR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 7000 and Ricoh GR. The full galleries are available at Olympus 7000 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7000 over the Ricoh GR
| 7000 | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus 7000
| GR | 7000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 52 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 7000 and Ricoh GR
| 7000 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 7000 enjoys outer measurements of 96mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 172 grams (0.38 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has sizing of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 7000 versus Ricoh GR in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the 7000 and the GR.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the 7000 and GR is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The image below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 7000 and GR.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 7000 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh GR will give you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged 7000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 7000 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7000 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 7000 | Ricoh GR |
| Also referred to as | mju 7000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-01-07 | 2013-04-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-260mm (7.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 300 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 172 grams (0.38 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 56 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $280 | $971 |